Legal Counsel for Blord Dismisses VDM’s Claims, Labels Trademark Dispute a Provocation

A legal representative for Linus Williams, popularly known as Blord, has officially responded to allegations made by social media personality VeryDarkMan (VDM) regarding his recent detention and legal challenges.

The lawyer’s statement aims to de-escalate the public narrative while clarifying the nature of the friction between the two figures.

Dismissal of Public Confrontation

The legal counsel categorically denied VDM’s claims that Blord’s team had been "pleading" for his release behind the scenes. Choosing to maintain professional distance, the lawyer stated he would not engage in a public dispute with VDM, citing the disparity in their professional backgrounds.

"As a learned professional, I cannot be seen engaging in public altercations with a layman," the lawyer noted, adding that his professional standing precludes him from participating in such social media-driven controversies.

The 'Ratel' Trademark Revelation

In a surprising turn, the counsel addressed the long-standing dispute over the "Ratel" brand name. He claimed that Blord’s previous assertions regarding the trademark were purely tactical rather than legal.

Provocation: The lawyer alleged that Blord only claimed to have trademarked "Ratel" to provoke VDM.

Legal Reality: He clarified that no such trademark was ever officially secured by Blord.

Escalation: The defense suggested that the conflict only reached its current intensity because VDM involved law enforcement, alleging that Blord was using the name for illicit activities.