Loading time...

NAIRAVILLE NIGERIAN FORUM

Court: Daily Mail P...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Court: Daily Mail Publisher to Receive £9.5m From Prince Harry and Six Others

1 Posts
1 Users
0 Reactions
34 Views
Posts: 335
Topic starter
(@t-piper)
Noble Member
Joined: 5 months ago
image

A group of high-profile figures, including Prince Harry, Sir Elton John, and Liz Hurley, has been ordered to make an initial legal costs payment of £9.54m to Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail. The payment deadline is set for 28 August, with total potential liabilities reaching significantly higher following a major legal defeat.

Case Background and Dismissal

The seven claimants had initiated legal action against ANL alleging widespread unlawful information-gathering. However, Mr Justice Nicklin dismissed the claims entirely, ruling that the public figures had failed to substantiate their allegations. The judge noted that the claimants pursued unsupportable arguments, including claims that top executives had misled a public inquiry, without withdrawing or adjusting them when evidence fell short.

Cost Implications and Indemnity Basis

  • Initial Payment: The group must pay £9.54m by 28 August.

  • Potential Total Exposure: Associated Newspapers stated legal expenditures reached up to £34.5m. Although the claimants held insurance covering up to £16.2m, they could face a residual personal liability of roughly £18m.

  • Indemnity Ruling: The judge ordered that costs be assessed on an indemnity basis, which heavily favors the publisher's ability to recover expenses.

While Justice Nicklin described the headline £34.5m cost figure as excessive and expressed concern over whether all incurred expenses were reasonable, he declined to impose a formal financial ceiling, citing potential arbitrariness and procedural unfairness.

Next Steps and Context

The claimants have until 2 October to decide whether to formally launch an appeal against both the substantive judgment and the costs order. Representatives for the claimants expressed strong disappointment with the outcome, characterizing the proceedings as lacking accountability, whereas ANL welcomed the ruling as a vindication of its journalists and executives.


Scroll to Top